Report:
Time-Dependent Pricing for Rooftop Solar Surplus to Incentivize BESS in Vietnam
Under both Decree 57/2025 (governing Direct Power Purchase Agreements, including private-wire RTS sales to large consumers) and Decree 58/2025 (governing self-production and self-consumption RTS systems), rooftop solar (RTS) owners selling surplus electricity to EVN under receive a price equal to the previous year’s average Vietnam Wholesale Electricity Market (VWEM) price. Both Decrees currently limit the total excess to 20% of RTS output; however, MOIT is considering raising the surplus export cap from the current 20% to 50% of total RTS output.
While a flat-price annual average approach provides simplicity, it eliminates the intraday price signal that is fundamental to i) incentivizing investment in behind-the-meter battery energy storage systems (BESS) and ii) supporting the grid in meeting the evening peak demand. A flat annual average price pays the same rate for a kilowatt-hour exported at midday—when the VWEM price is at its lowest—while for one exported during the evening peak, when prices are 30–45% above the daily average.
A new XanhTerra Report evaluates an option in Vietnam to support behind-the-meter BESS adoption, using a market-based approach. We examine how other countries have transitioned from flat to time-granular export pricing for distributed solar surplus, and the measurable impact on BESS uptake. The international evidence is unambiguous: when export compensation reflects real-time or time-of-use wholesale prices, it creates a powerful commercial signal for RTS owners to invest in battery storage.
The sections below provide a high level summary of the Report (full report only available by sending an email with your name and contact information to contact@xanhterra.com)
XANHTERRA SUGGESTION
One Pricing Formula Change. No New Infrastructure
We suggest MOIT to consider amending the surplus RTS export pricing in both Decree 57 (DPPA) and Decree 58 (self-production/self-consumption) from the previous year's annual average VWEM price to the previous year's average half-hourly VWEM price, matched for the time of export.
This single change could transform the economics of behind-the-meter BESS across Vietnam's entire rooftop solar sector—from household systems under Decree 58 to commercial-scale installations under Decree 57—directly supporting peak demand reduction and accelerating domestic BESS market development aligned with PDP8 objectives
The Problem: Flat Pricing Suppresses Investment Signals
Under Decrees 57 and 58, surplus rooftop solar (RTS) sold to EVN is priced at the previous year's annual average VWEM price—a single flat rate regardless of when electricity is exported.
But the Vietnam Wholesale Electricity Market (VWEM) tells a very different story. XanhTerra's analysis of five years of half-hourly price data (2021–2025) from Vietnam's National System and Market Operator (NSMO) reveals a pronounced and widening "duck curve" in wholesale prices.
40-50%
Midday Trough
FMP drops 40–50% below the daily average during solar hours (9:30 AM–2:30 PM) due to solar saturation
30–45%
Evening Peak
FMP rises 30–45% above average during evening demand (5:00–8:00 PM) when thermal generation fills the gap
60-80%
Intraday Spreak
The midday-to-evening price spread reaches 60–80% of the average price—and is widening over the years
Zero!
BESS Signal
Under flat annual pricing, RTS owners have zero financial incentive to shift exports from midday to evening peak
Average VWEM FMP Averaged by Half-Hour Interval, 2021-2025
Source: VWEM data from NSMO, XanhTerra analysis
Percent Difference Relative to Average VWEM FMP Price, 2021–2025
Source: VWEM data from NSMO, XanhTerra analysis

The core problem: A flat annual average price pays the same for a kWh exported at midday—when the grid doesn't need it—as one exported at 6 PM when demand peaks. This applies to a household with a 10 kWp system under Decree 58 and a factory with a 500 kWp system under Decree 57 alike.
Vietnam's grid faces its most acute stress during evening peak hours (5:00–8:30 PM), when air conditioning loads remain high but solar generation has declined. Surplus RTS exported at midday provides limited system value. A time-dependent pricing mechanism would align RTS behavior with grid needs.
Back to Top
INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE
What Happens When You Fix the Price Signal
Several major markets have transitioned from flat to time-varying export compensation. In every case, this change has driven significant behind-the-meter BESS adoption.
1
California – NEM 3.0
Hourly avoided-cost export pricing (Apr 2023)
California shifted from flat net metering to hourly export pricing based on 576 distinct rate combinations. Midday export rates dropped to ~US$0.08/kWh while evening peaks can reach US$0.30–3.50/kWh—a 4–40x spread. Solar-plus-storage now achieves shorter payback (7–8 years) than solar-only (8–10 years).
Battery attachment: 10% → 60%+ in 12 months
2
United Kingdom – Smart Export Guarantee (SEG)
Large suppliers required to offer export tariffs above zero while allowing market competition (Jan 2020)
The SEG created a market for time-varying export tariffs. Octopus Energy (71% of SEG registrations) offers half-hourly rates reaching 27–30p/kWh at peak vs. zero at midday. Without any subsidies, the SEG creates a financial context in which storage makes sense—batteries increase self-consumption and enable peak export.
From one BESS in April 2022 to 22,398 domestic battery systems (193 MWh) installed in one year (Apr 2024–Mar 2025)
3
Australia – Two way Tariffs
Time-varying FiT + export charges + 30% battery rebate (July 2025)
SA Power Networks charges for midday exports (10AM–4PM) while crediting 12–13c/kWh for evening exports (5–9PM). NT doubled peak export rates to 18.7c/kWh. The federal 30% battery rebate ($4,000 for typical 10 kWh system) complements the price signal.
183,245 batteries sold in H2 2025—surpassing previous 4 years combined
4
Germany – Self Consumption Model
High retail-to-export spread (no dynamic export tariff)
Germany's flat export tariff means BESS adoption (1.8 million units, 19 GWh by end-2024) has been driven by high retail prices, not export timing signals. Recent research using 448 German households confirmed dynamic tariffs would have yielded 12.7% higher net gains.
Counterpoint: High retail price-driven BESS, not export-signal driven
The Opportunity
XanhTerra's suggestion is that Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) consider changing the payment price of the exported RTS surplus to the grid under both Decree 57 and 58, as part of the upcoming revision. Rather than using an annual average flat-price, MOIT could use the previous year’s wholesale electricity market prices averaged across each 30-min intervals. This change in averaging methodology would unlock BESS investment signals across the full spectrum of RTS scales, from household systems of 1–10 kW paired with small residential batteries, to C&I installations of 100 kW–1 MW paired with commercial-scale storage.
Data and Infrastructure Already Exist
Vietnam's VWEM already operates on 30-minute settlement intervals, and NSMO publicly provides five years of full market price data. No new market infrastructure is needed.
The planned updates to Decree 57 require metering equipment for DPPA participants. Updates to Decree 58 require two-way meters for all connected RTS. These meters will provide time-stamped export data—the foundation for time-dependent settlement.
Both Decrees Benefit
Decree 57 (DPPA/private wire) affects C&I consumers with larger RTS systems. Time-granular pricing incentivizes commercial-scale BESS (100 kWh–1 MWh) that can sell surpluses at much higher evening peak prices rather than exporting when the grid doesn't need it.
Decree 58 (self-production/self-consumption) affects the largest number of RTS installations—households and small businesses. Time-granular pricing would incentivize residential BESS (5–15 kWh) and small C&I storage, creating a mass market for behind-the-meter batteries.
The common flat-price mechanism means a single reform—replacing the previous year's annual average with the previous year's half-hourly average—simultaneously unlocks BESS signals at every scale.
Alignment with Broader Policy Objectives
  • Peak demand reduction (critical given 10–15% demand growth projected for 2026)
  • RTS expansion (the proposed 20% → 50% surplus cap is more valuable with time-granular pricing)
  • BESS market development (complementing Circular 62/2025/TT-BCT for grid-connected BESS)
  • Strengthening the DPPA ecosystem
Reach out to us for the full XanhTerra report at contact@xanhterra.com